User talk:182.182.97.3

This is 182.182.97.3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not going to approve a draft which cites unreliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 182.182.97.3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The cites are reliable, Dunya News, IMDb and Daily Times are unreliable? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hook (2022 TV series) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hook (2022 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But you yourself admitted the sources added were reliable? 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

I couldn't ping you but per the notice at wp:ANI you should notify the involved per the notice above the page. Thanks! Toadette^Edit! 15:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will take care of it. Thank you! 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review the articles I made. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hook (2022 TV series) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Saqib were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hook (2022 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Saqib were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Resubmitting with little or no improvements is considered disruptive and may lead to the drafts being rejected. You must provide at least two sources that are not 1. promos, 2. user generated content, 3. mentions, and 4. routine news coverage and 5. unreliable. Toadette^Edit! 16:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

DO NOT resubmit with zero improvements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 16:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hook (2022 TV series) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hook (2022 TV series). Thanks! S0091 (talk) 16:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series). Thanks! S0091 (talk) 17:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The two references added before resubmission clearly fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Also needs to have a disclosure from submitter per WP:PAID along with other accounts they have used on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get paid for editing. I wish I was but I'm not a paid editor. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 18:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A review is already in progress, check talk page. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gumn (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gumn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gumn (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gumn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gumn (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I do not see a single edit, let alone improvement, since my last review

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gumn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gumn (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

(edit conflict)I am seeing much more unreliability than expected, and I am also in fear that this draft might be rejected as non notable. The draft should contain high quality sources that discusses the subject in detail, and statements supported by the unreliable ones should be removed. Or simply shorten (stub) it so that the only sources are the reliable ones.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gumn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 14:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

re. your block[edit]

I have no idea why were you blocked by Daniel Case for disruptive editing while I do not see any edits that are disruptive. I expect that you will also be blocked from the draft I have just declined. Toadette^Edit! 14:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another user complained at AIV that this user kept resubmitting the drafts for approval without having made anywhere near the requested amount of changes. Good-faith edits become disruptive when you have been asked not to make them and continue to do so. The idea here is for this user to address the notability issue in the week during which they cannot resubmit the article for approval. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The best sources[edit]

The best sources will have an About page along with their editorial ethics/guidelines which sometimes will be on the About page or on a separate page. Using DAWN as an example, you will see both if you scroll to the bottom of their Home page. Images.Dawn are contributor posts [1] so not likely not WP:RS and certainly nothing in the comments section is RS. The About page should describe who they are, purpose, etc. which then can be used to determine if they meet RS. Generally, if they do not claim to be a news organization with some kind of guidelines that is a hint it probably is not RS. It should at least make clear somewhere who owns it and have Terms of Use. The other attributes are a named author in the by-line who is a staff journalist rather than a role by-line like Staff, New desk, etc. as those are usually press release or by a contributor. Contributor posts should be clearly marked as such and likewise for any sponsored content. See WP:NEWSORGINDIA for some examples of how sponsored content is marked by various news orgs, though that is not a guarantee they are making paid content clear (i.e. TOI).

Using Galaxy Lollywood as another example, I see no About page so had to do some digging and found this which describes the site as an "entertainment portal" and this, which is a promotional fluff piece but it describes it as a blog. Therefore, Galaxy Lollywood cannot be used to establish notability and likely not usable per WP:BLOG. S0091 (talk) 17:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, even if RS the content within the article has to be assessed. If it's mostly an interview or what those affiliated say, then it is a primary source/not independent which cannot be used to establish notable as secondary sources are required. Press releases or if based on a press release is the same. In order for it to be secondary, it needs to contain the author's own research, analysis, etc. S0091 (talk) 17:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.